In partnership with
In October 2025, a quiet standard was published by an international committee convened with the Dutch standards body USPI. ISO 18136-1 defines a shared framework for the nuclear digital ecosystem. It sets how data is structured and exchanged across every reactor-related facility. It reads like a technical handbook. It functions as a passport.
Artificial intelligence (AI) cannot operate in a nuclear plant on trust alone. A regulator must be able to check the data a model reads and the answers it gives. A conformant digital ecosystem is what makes that check possible. ISO 18136 is the route to it.
ISO 18136 sets one data framework for every reactor-related facility
The standard is narrow by design. It spans the full life cycle and every engineering discipline, from civil to software. It was developed in ISO Technical Committee 184, the industrial-data group.
Its job is coordination, not reinvention. The framework guides the collective use of existing standards to specify what information a facility must hold. The narrow scope is the point. Limiting the industry let the framework go deep on management and lifecycle.
UK, US, and Canada already agreed the rules for nuclear AI
The regulators moved first. The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, the UK Office for Nuclear Regulation, and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission have aligned. They published joint principles for deploying AI in nuclear activities. Three regulators, one position.
Each is building its own machinery. The US NRC issued an AI strategic plan and named a chief AI officer in 2025. The International Atomic Energy Agency published deployment guidance and convened a symposium on AI and nuclear energy in Vienna. The gate is being defined in public.
Nuclear goes first because its regulatory gate is already built
Most sectors lack this. A data centre or an LNG terminal has no regulator demanding to audit an AI's inputs. Nuclear does. That demand is exactly what a conformance standard answers.
So nuclear becomes the first adopter, not the last. The regulator wants verifiable data. The standard specifies verifiable data. The two meet. Where the gate is already built, the passport has somewhere to be stamped.
Conformance runs on standards nuclear already knows
The framework leans on familiar parts. Information handover follows CFIHOS, the capital-facilities handover specification. Asset management follows ISO 55000. Information management follows ISO 19650. Data integration follows ISO 15926.
None of these is new. What ISO 18136 adds is the nuclear context that binds them. An operator already running these standards is most of the way to conformance. The passport rewards the prepared.
Could you prove your facility data conforms to a standard a regulator would accept?
A passport only counts across borders. This one is an ISO standard
A national rule stops at the frontier. An ISO standard does not. ISO 18136 was written by an international committee, with members across Europe, North America, and Asia. A precursor technical report set out nuclear digital ecosystem specifications before it.
That breadth is the value. A vendor that conforms once can deploy across jurisdictions. A regulator in one country can trust data shaped to the same framework abroad. The passport crosses borders because the standard does.
Nuclear investment heads for £154bn a year. The data needs one language
The stakes are not abstract. Global nuclear investment runs at over £51bn ($70bn, €60bn) today. The International Energy Agency says tripling capacity by 2050 needs far more. Spending would peak near £154bn ($210bn, €179bn) around 2035.
Every new reactor generates a mountain of design, construction, and operating data. Without a shared framework, that data fragments across vendors and tools. AI cannot reason over a mess it cannot read. The standard is the language that makes the mountain usable.
The window is 2027 to 2028. Conformance is not a weekend job
Adoption will not be instant. Operators must map their data to the framework, retrofit legacy systems, and train teams. That work takes years, not weeks.
The practical window opens around 2027 to 2028, as regulators firm up their AI expectations. Operators who start now will be ready. Those who wait will meet the deadline unprepared. Engineers and regulators, not the model, decide what conformance means.
The passport is printed. Most operators have not applied
The standard exists. The regulators are aligned. The building blocks are familiar. What is missing is the operator who treats conformance as a strategy, not a chore.
Nuclear will prove the route. LNG and other critical infrastructure will follow the same path. The passport is printed, and the queue has barely formed. The first to apply will cross first.
Next week: Q2 closes. The handover gap is a category now.
Summer's here. Larry handles calls, jobs, and memberships automatically.
Air Design used to spend hours every day manually calling their 600 members to schedule seasonal tune-ups.
They turned on Podium's AI Membership Coordinator. It contacted 471 members, booked 187 jobs, and generated $24,000 in revenue.
Across home services, the story repeats.
Magnolia Plumbing cut invoice-to-payment time to 6 minutes and saved 60 hours of admin work every month.
This is what Podium's AI Operating System does: phones answered, jobs booked, invoices collected — automatically, without adding headcount.