The 250,000 Worker Gap

France needs 10,000 to 15,000 new nuclear workers every year for the next seven years. Across 56 reactors and 3,000 supplier companies, EDF employs 220,000 people in what is the country's third largest industrial sector. Yet even France, with its unmatched nuclear heritage, cannot train replacements fast enough.

This is not only a French problem. The IEA World Energy Employment 2025 report confirms a global pattern. In nuclear and grid professions, retirements outnumber new entrants by 1.7 to 1. Across advanced economies, 2.4 energy workers near retirement for every new hire under 25. The workforce powering 440 reactors worldwide is ageing out faster than any training programme can respond.

The US Department of Energy projects 236,000 workers are needed to manufacture, construct, and operate advanced reactors through 2035. That figure rises to 376,000 by 2050. The European Nuclear Society estimates Europe alone needs 300,000 new nuclear jobs in the next 15 years.

Meanwhile, 60% of energy companies report critical hiring bottlenecks, according to the IEA's survey of 700 firms. The UK must expand its nuclear workforce from 96,000 to 120,000 by 2030. China has 22 reactors under construction, the most globally. South Korea is exporting reactor technology to the UAE and Czech Republic. Every programme demands workers that do not yet exist.

Training a Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) takes five to seven years. Nuclear welders need three years of additional certification beyond standard welding qualifications. Even fast track programmes require 15 to 24 months of intensive study before a graduate can operate plant systems independently.

The maths exposes the crisis. If 40% of the current workforce retires by 2030, and each replacement takes five years to train, the industry needed to start in 2020. It largely did not. Between 2012 and 2022, US nuclear engineering graduates declined by 25%. Western Europe and North America hired almost nobody from the late 1980s to the early 2000s, creating what recruiters call a "generation sized gap" in experienced staff.

Several countries have built training models worth studying.

UAE: The Emirates Nuclear Energy Corporation created a 24 month Diploma in Nuclear Technology and a three year graduate pathway to SRO certification. By 2020, 22 UAE nationals held senior reactor operator licences at Barakah. Full scope APR-1400 simulators accelerate hands on training that once took twice as long.

France: The £51m ($81m, €64m) 3NC Normandy training centre aims to train 5,400 people by 2030. EDF runs 700 specialised training programmes across its fleet. The investment totals £33m ($53m, €42m) in state funding alone.

South Korea: KEPCO International Nuclear Graduate School trains 100 students annually, with 50% drawn from international cohorts. South Korea assigns 200 operators and engineers to Barakah annually as part of a ten year post completion support package. This "workforce export" model bundles training with reactor sales.

China: CNNC employs 100,000 people across 110 subsidiaries. Its Nuclear Industry College provides training aligned with the country's six year average reactor construction timeline, the fastest globally. Turnkey export packages include workforce development, giving Chinese vendors a competitive edge in markets from Pakistan to Argentina.

Here is the gap our analysis identifies. Governments announce nuclear expansion targets without matching workforce budgets. The UK plans new reactors at Sizewell and Wylfa but must find 24,000 additional workers by 2030. The US has appropriated £79m ($100m, €93m) for regional workforce consortia, yet the administration has not released the funds. New York State recently committed £31m ($40m, €37m) over four years, a fraction of what 1 GW of advanced nuclear capacity demands.

The IEA calculates that preventing the global energy skills gap from widening requires £2bn ($2.6bn, €2.4bn) per year in additional training investment. That represents less than 0.1% of global education spending. The return is enormous. Nuclear wages grew 3.2% in 2025, second only to oil and gas, and average pay runs 50% higher than other electricity generation sources.

Certification reciprocity remains a barrier. A qualified reactor operator in France cannot simply transfer credentials to the UK or US. Each national regulator maintains separate licensing requirements. The IAEA provides guidance frameworks but no binding mutual recognition agreement exists.

Some progress is emerging. South Korea's bundled training and export model effectively creates bilateral workforce pathways. The UAE's programme, built with Korean expertise, demonstrates that new entrant nations can develop domestic capability within a decade. Cross industry recruitment from oil, gas, and defence sectors offers another route, as these professionals already hold safety critical certifications and understand regulated environments.

Our research identifies three workforce strategies gaining traction globally.

Compressed training pipelines. The UAE reduced SRO qualification from seven years to three through simulator intensive programmes and structured mentoring. France's 3NC centre targets first graduates by September 2025.

Workforce export models. South Korea and China bundle training with reactor sales, creating sustained demand for domestic trainers whilst building capability in client nations. This model gives exporters a long term commercial advantage.

Cross sector recruitment. Nuclear plants and AI data centres share operational demands: 24/7 uptime, cooling system management, and safety critical protocols. Workers transitioning from fossil fuel plants, military service, or offshore operations bring transferable skills that can halve retraining timelines.

The workforce gap creates both risk and opportunity. Reactor construction projects face delays and cost overruns when skilled labour is unavailable. Hinkley Point C in the UK has seen its workforce triple from 8,500 to 27,000 since 2014, illustrating the scale of demand a single project generates.

For investors, workforce readiness is becoming a leading indicator of project viability. Nations with training infrastructure, such as France, South Korea, and the UAE, will deliver reactors faster. Those without it will face the same bottlenecks that have plagued Western nuclear construction for decades.

The IEA's £2bn ($2.6bn, €2.4bn) annual investment figure covers the entire energy sector. Nuclear specific training costs are a fraction of this, yet the sector competes with renewables, grid infrastructure, and fossil fuel decommissioning for the same technical talent pool.

Nuclear's renaissance depends on people, not just policy. The industry needs 250,000 or more skilled workers by 2035. Training pipelines take years to fill. Retirements will not wait.

The countries solving this, France with state funded academies, South Korea with export bundled training, the UAE with compressed certification, and China with integrated industrial planning, will lead the next generation of nuclear deployment. Everyone else will be waiting in a queue that has nothing to do with grid connections.

Next week: Island Nations Can't Build Reactors. They're Importing Nuclear Power Instead.

AI is moving faster than any other technology cycle in history. New models. New tools. New claims. New noise.

Most people feel like they’re behind. But the people that don’t, aren’t smarter. They’re just better informed.

Forward Future is a daily news briefing for people who want clarity, not hype. In one concise newsletter each day, you’ll get the most important AI and tech developments, learn why they matter, and what they signal about what’s coming next.

We cover real product launches, model updates, policy shifts, and industry moves shaping how AI actually gets built, adopted, and regulated. Written for operators, builders, leaders, and anyone who wants to sound sharp when AI comes up in the meeting.

It takes about five minutes to read, but the edge lasts all day.

Sign Up. Look Smart.